Diana Marcinkevica vs Ishwari Matere Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L W L L L L L
Form
L W L L W W L L L LH2H: Marcinkevica 1 - 0 Matere
They have played 2 sets in total, with Marcinkevica winning 2 and Matere winning 0. The last match between Marcinkevica and Matere was at the W75 Pune, 26-01-2025, Q1 round, Hard with Diana Marcinkevica getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Diana Marcinkevica | 1 |
| Ishwari Matere | 0 |
W75 Pune(26-01-2025)
6
2
6
0
| Marcinkevica | Stats | Matere |
|---|---|---|
| 13% (1-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-3) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 594 | Ranking | N/A |
| 196 | Highest Rank | N/A |
| 32 | Age | 25 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 8 | Titles | 0 |
| 51% (523-497) | Career Total W/L | 38% (22-36) |
| $31,119 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Raducanu VS Kostyuk PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Marcinkevica VS Matere H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-0 |
Stats 
Diana Marcinkevica
Player
Ishwari Matere
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
9
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
||||
Marcinkevica VS Matere H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 0:58:6 | Average Match Time | 0:58:6 |
| 49% (25/51) | 1st Serve % | 50% (23/46) |
| 84% (21/25) | 1st Serve Win % | 39% (9/23) |
| 31% (8/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 17% (4/23) |
| 54% (7/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 29% (2/7) |
| 72% (33/46) | Return Points Win % | 43% (22/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Diana Marcinkevica Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alicia Martial
Player
Diana Marcinkevica
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
62)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arlinda Rushiti
Player
Diana Marcinkevica
52%
(
16 of
31)
1st Serve %
56%
(
22 of
39)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
14 of
16)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
11 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
43
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Yashaswini Panwar
Player
Diana Marcinkevica
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
14 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesca Pace
Player
Diana Marcinkevica
58%
(
61 of
106)
1st Serve %
66%
(
66 of
100)
10
Aces
3
12
Double Faults
7
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
42 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
107
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alevtina Ibragimova
Player
Diana Marcinkevica
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
3
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diana Marcinkevica
Player
Ishwari Matere
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
9
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ariana Geerlings
Player
Diana Marcinkevica
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thasaporn Naklo
Player
Diana Marcinkevica
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Zhibek Kulambayeva
Player
Diana Marcinkevica
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
26 of
53)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Ishwari Matere Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Milana Maslenkova
Player
Ishwari Matere
49%
(
21 of
43)
1st Serve %
49%
(
35 of
71)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
86%
(
18 of
21)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
36)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diana Marcinkevica
Player
Ishwari Matere
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
23 of
46)
2
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
9
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
22 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sahaja Yamalapalli
Player
Ishwari Matere
56%
(
20 of
36)
1st Serve %
40%
(
16 of
40)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
9 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ishwari Matere
Player
Prathyusha Rachapudi
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve %
41%
(
17 of
41)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
11
65%
(
15 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
38%
(
3 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
42%
(
13 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
43
Total Points Won
29
|
6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ishwari Matere
Player
Abhilasha Bista
43%
(
17 of
40)
1st Serve %
44%
(
16 of
36)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
5
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
12 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
22
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Abhaya Vemuri
Player
Ishwari Matere
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
51%
(
25 of
49)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
5 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51% (523/497) | Win/Loss | 38% (22/36) |
| 51% (1210/1159) | Sets Win/Loss | 39% (48/76) |
| 51% (11048/10750) | Games Win/Loss | 44% (474/604) |
| 54% (174/147) | Hard Win/Loss | 36% (16/28) |
| 47% (191/217) | Clay Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) |
| 54% (156/131) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 50% (2/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.02 |
| 1789 | Aces Total | 12 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.39 |
| 2841 | Total Double Faults | 203 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 554.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 197.45 |
| 56% (23642/42100) | 1st Serve % | 53% (1174/2221) |
| 64% (15129/23642) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (652/1174) |
| 43% (7903/18459) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (384/1047) |
| 46% (2347/5093) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (121/237) |
| 45% (18985/42313) | Return Points Win % | 45% (951/2133) |
| 0% (0/5) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 22% (5/18) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 31% (10/22) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (386/383) | Challenger W/L | 39% (11/17) |
| 64% (122/69) | Futures W/L | 37% (11/19) |
| 51% (518/1011) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 38% (22/58) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (113/229) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 50% (170/338) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (4/8) |
| 84% (511/430) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 96% (23/22) |
| 16% (511/81) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 4% (23/1) |
| 18% (509/94) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (35/0) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
